If you occupy your home under an assured shorthold tenancy, you may be amongst the thousands of people who have received from your landlord a section 21 eviction notice before the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 takes effect on 1st May 2026. On that day the law changes. Tenants who previously could have been evicted on as little as 2 months notice will then have lifetime security of tenure. Landlords will only be able to evict a tenant if they can prove to a judge that they have legitimate grounds to do so. What this means is that many buy-to-let landlords are trying to get out of the market before the law changes on that date. So what do you need to do if you are a tenant who has received a section 21 eviction notice?
Sit tight. At least for the time being. A landlord who evicts you, still has to go through the process of getting a possession order through the courts, even though there is currently an accelerated process for doing this. And even after a court order has been obtained, the only way which a landlord can forcibly evict a tenant is by engaging the services of a bailiff, which itself can take months.
if you have received a section 21 notice but your landlord has not issued court proceedings against you before a 1st August 2026 cut off date, the Section 21 notice will lapse and the landlord will have to start the whole process again. Only this time round, you will be a sitting tenant. It means that the only way your landlord will be able to evict you is if they can convince a County Court judge that they have legitimate grounds for ending your tenancy. A process which could take up to a year, given the current delays to the court system in the UK.
If you have children living with you, or are pregnant, or are old or have a serious health condition, your local housing authority may have a duty to ensure that you are not left out on the street. In other words, homeless legislation regards you as someone having a ‘priority need’ for rehousing. So don’t forget to get in touch with your local council as soon as possible.
Once the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 takes effect on the 1st May 2026, private residential landlords in England will have only 1 month to get tenancies correctly documented or face fines of up to £7,000. This means serving existing tenants with a tenant information sheet explaining their new rights under the 2025 Act. These new rights can include lifetime security of tenure, protection against unfair rent increases, the ability to vacate on as little as 2 months prior written notice, and the outlawing of discrimination against tenants who are on welfare or who have children living with them. For landlords who get it wrong, there may be no second chances. Just a financial penalty.
For new tenancies, or those which were previously undocumented, landlords must issue tenants (as well as prospective tenants) with a written statement of terms containing all the information required by the Assured Tenancies (Private Rented Sector) (Written Satement of Terms etc and Information Sheet) (England) Regulations 2026. The content of that written statement of terms must conform exactly to the requirements of the schedule to the 2026 Regulations. That statement can either be standalone or incorporated in a formal tenancy agreement. The Information Sheet to be served on existing tenants must be downloaded as a PDF and must be issued to tenants either as hard copy or by email but exactly in the prescribed format. To help landlords with this, the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government has issued guidance published 20th March 2026 titled, ‘The Renters’s Rights Act Information Sheet 2026: The information sheet about the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 that landlords and their agents must give to tenants’.
Whilst there is no prescribed template for the statement of terms, it is important that particular care is taken to include within these statements of terms any legitimate non-fault grounds of possession to which the tenancy may be subject. Landlords who fail to do this may later have difficulty in recovering possession even when they might otherwise have had legitimate grounds to do so.
The MHCLG Guidance includes the following advice:
the information sheet does not have to be given to lodgers but must be given to every tenant named on the tenancy agreement
the tenant information sheet is only valid when downloaded from the Government website;
the information sheet must be given to tenants either by printing a hard copy and posting or hand delivering to tenants or alternatively sending a PDF electronically as an attachment to an email or text message where it is appropriate to do so. However it is not sufficient just to email or text a link to a tenant;
the legislation does not require landlords to change or reissue an existing written tenancy agreement;
where a tenancy was informally entered into before 1st May 2026 without a written agreement, the landlord must provide a statements of tenancy terms (see above);
Social landlords do not need to provide this information sheet.
Ceres Power Holdings is my star performer for November 2025. A rise in the share price of more than 100% in just over 2 months. Even Rolls-Royce can’t beat that. Which gives me a dilemma. Do I cash in part of my shareholding to lock in the profit? Or do I hold my nerve? Just like playing Blackjack. Another card please! But I’ve got a hunch that it’s gone as high as it’s going to go. So I’d better cash in 50% and play the rest. It’s a mistake I made with Rolls-Royce when their shares hit 200%, and I cashed in 50% of my holding and played the rest. If I’d held my nerve, I might have got 100% of 650%. Because that’s how high Rolls Royce shares have flown. But I’m not complaining.
I’ve never understood why so many people get addicted to online gambling. Playing the stock market is so much more fun. Even when I’m gambling with small change. When Bloomsbury Publishing’s share price increased 100%, I cashed in 50% of my holding. I’m glad I did. After that the share price began to tumble and I sold the rest of my holding a couple of weeks later. I also had lucky escapes with Cineworld and Boohoo
Three months ago I’d never even heard of Ceres Power Holdings, until I was looking for some renewable energy companies in which to invest. I certainly haven’t seen it being tipped anywhere.
At a time when so many major UK pharmaceuticals are planning to upsticks and move their operations to the United States, it is also refreshing to see that some companies are still listing on the London Stock Market. The three new listings are Shawbrook Bank; Beauty Tech and Princes Group. What attracts me about Shawbrook is that it is a bank with a focus on small business finance. And what can I say about Princes Group? Except that I just love a tuna sandwich. So far I have been unsuccessful in my attempts to buy shares in these new listings through my share ISA. But that may only be because those shares are so new. I’ll keep trying.
When a share has been tipped, it is already too late. Everybody is piling in. So the skill for anyone with a share ISA is to use their own gut feelings to try to identify those shares which may be tipped in the future. For me, it is not so much following recommendations but that crucial zigzag line. Is it creeping upwards? Or is it beginning to plateau? One of the things I’ve noticed is that the best time to buy a share is about 8.45am on a weekday, when adjustments have factored in and the share price is at its lowest. I also think that it’s important to have an awareness of world events and how these are likely to affect share prices over the medium term. That’s not to say that I’ve never followed up share-tips.
As a fledgling investor in the years before covid crashed the markets, it was an Investors Chronicle tip which prompted me to buy some shares in Rolls-Royce. The value of which has since increased six fold. My only regret is that after they had doubled, I sold about 40% of the stock in the expectation that the rise could not continue. But it did. And more. That was followed by another Investors Chronicle share tip, which prompted me to invest in BAC Industries.
Then came Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. And America’s shakiness over its continued Nato commitment, which Britain had foolishly taken for granted, when its own military capability was hollowed out in the Cameron years. Things like an aircraft carrier without any aircraft because what had remained of Britain’s harrier fleet had their wings cut off. What was the sense in that? It was in response to that dangerous madness that I invested a few hundred pounds in Scotland based Babcock International Group, which I had discovered from my own research and whose share price has also risen
I am an ethical investor. I try to invest in companies which either manufacture in the UK or which source UK manufactured products. It is those companies which create our jobs. Something I don’t understand is why Ed Milband’s green energy revolution is so dependent on Chinese manufactured hardware. It is why, a couple of months back, I looked around for companies which manufactured energy renewable hardware in the UK. I came up with three companies in which I invested. Of those, my most successful investment has been Ceres, which has seen a significant rise in its share price. One of the things I’ve never understood, is why European economies impose ever increasing regulation on their own domestic industries whilst at the same time allowing those same domestic industries to be undercut by countries whose workforce do not enjoy the same employment protections. In some cases even with a suspicion that slave labour has been used in the manufacture of those outsourced products. What is the excuse for anyone importing anything made by slave labour? I’m reminded of the 18th century sugar boycotts. Maybe we should learn something from that. My ethics will also not allow me to invest in banks, finance companies, investment trusts or online gambling. Forget it!
But investing in UK manufacturing or companies which source UK manufactured products, is becoming ever harder to do. I noticed that since Trump’s tariffs came into effect, many UK pharmaceuticals are planning to up-sticks and move their operations across to the United States. I can also see that happening in the future with the UK film industry, which is now facing 100% tariffs from the United States. Only a week back, I invested in Pensana, one of the few companies outside China which specialises in the extraction and refining of rare earths, of which China currently has a 90% monopoly. It is those rare earths which are critical to the UK’s development of it’s own high-tech. Then a couple of days ago, I read that Pensana had cancelled its project to build a UK rare earth refinery because it is getting a much better deal if it relocates to America. I’m not sure how this is going to affect its share price. I might just hang in there and see what happens. At the moment it’s all a bit volatile.
Faced with tariffs not only from America but also from Europe, particularly as regards UK steel production, it would seem to me that the only way our government can protect British manufacturing from annihilation is to use its own buying power to increase the domestic market. By insisting that government departments and others in the public sector, source manufactured products only from UK companies where it is possible to do so in preference over cheaper products from elsewhere. Why not? That is what Trump is doing. And we are seeing it work for the American economy. Our public sector is also in a unique position to do that. Wake up! Ed Miliband!
Since it replaced the centuries old Stamp Duty in 2003, Stamp Duty Land Tax has become one of the UK’s most complex taxes.
Within 14 days of completion of any significant property transaction, it is the responsibility of the buyer or leaseholder to file a stamp stamp duty land tax return and pay any applicable duty on the transaction. This is usually uploaded electronically by the conveyancer who completed the purchase, save that legal responsibility for ensuring that everything contained within the return is correct and that the correct duty is paid, is placed firmly on the client-purchaser, not the conveyancer who acted on the purchase.
In terms of complexity, a stamp duty land tax return can be compared with any complex self-assessment tax return. And it is the responsibility of the taxpayer to get it right as in most cases, HMRC take the information provided on trust unless there is something specific which raises query.
Most purchaser – clients are not tax experts and will rely on the advice given by their conveyancer as to how much stamp duty land tax they will be required to pay. However they must still make sure that the information they provide to the lawyer is correct, particularly as regards any second homes. Once the client has seen and approved the draft stamp duty land tax tax return, the conveyancer will upload it on the HMRC portal. Almost instantaneously, that conveyancer will receive back an electronic certificate in form SDLT5, confirming that the stamp duy tax return has been uploaded and received, even if the duty itself has not yet been paid. It is that SDLT5 which will then enable the conveyancer to register the transaction and pay the stamp duty from money held on account from the particular client. There are also some cases involving trusts, where the issues are so complex, that the conveyancer should advise their client to seek specialist tax advice before approving the stamp land tax return for upload.
Because of the complexity of some conveyancing transactions, there is always a risk of miscalculating the amount of duty chargeable on a particular transaction. The risk applies both ways. There’s firstly the risk that you may overpay stamp duty on a transaction because your conveyancer has not identified a legitimate relief to which you are entitled. Or you may accidentally fail to declare something which would otherwise have had the effect of increasing the tax liability which would otherwise be payable. Either way, the mistake is expensive.
BRUCE AND HOLLY 