housing, London, property, real estate, society, Uncategorized

Smart Ways to Slash Your Energy Bills Today

You will have heard about the recent increase in the UK energy price cap. Around 4%, And you will have got the usual advice about moving to fixed price tariffs. Maybe saving you £150 a year on the increased cost. Big deal! In this article we focus on some practical ways in which any householder can make a significant reduction in their energy bills simply by reducing their energy usage to what they actually need. Remember that 400 years ago no- one in the UK had even heard of fossil fuels. Yes there were fewer of us. Under 9 million. And remember that in 1650 most working families lived in a single room. And their diet was whatever they could pull out of the ground. Probably quite healthy by today’s standard. Only rich people ate meat. So you didn’t even need an oven. Just something to boil the peas. Or heat the kettle. If you got too cold you might throw a log on the fire. Or just wrap up.

For me, the biggest contribution to reduced electricity use has been the transition from tungsten filament to modern low energy light bulbs. An 85% saving in energy costs. And do you remember those horrible halogen light bulbs which became part of that transition? The blinding white light? Like a pair of car headlights shining in your face. So now we’re all low energy.

I’m not tempted to take up the £7,500 government grant to replace my gas boiler with a heat pump. It feels too much like an emerging technology. Like being asked to invest in a brick phone. I’m just not going to go there. And even heat pumps burn energy. Replacing gas with more expensive electricity. And I’m not sure it would even work. So I’ll wait until something better comes along. And I’m not rushing out to buy an electric car. I can’t remember the last time I filled my car with petrol. It spends most of its time parked up. I only use it occasionally to stop in seizing up. Living in London, means I am able to use my freedom pass to get about. Combining my freedom pass with a senior rail card makes travel very affordable for me. It only cost me £10 to get from West London to Southend. How cheap is that? Even if I didn’t have a freedom pass, I might still choose to use public transport where it is possible and afforable to do so and maybe purchase a network rail card , which is available to anyone. So I don’t understand why the government isn’t doing more to get people out of their cars and use public transport. What did Rachel Reeves do instead in her first budget? Increase the cap on bus fares from £2 to £3. Not 5% or 10%. But a whacking 50% increase. A £3 bus cap may not sound much. But it’s £6 for a return trip. And £12 if there is two of you. Well that’s really going to encourage bus usage!

Nor am I going to install solar panels on my roof. It’s too much of a fire risk. Like charging an e-bike in my back bedroom. How do I know that it’s going to be correctly installed? And what is the real saving? The thing about solar electricity is that it cannot be stored. It is electrical energy which is being produced when we least need it. And yes – I know that plug-in solar panels have just come on the market. But it feels too much like a toy. Even at a cost of £400 for the equipment, the trickle of energy it would produce would take me 5 years to get payback. And I don’t understand why renewable electricity cannot be stored? In the final part of this article I’m going to list out those simple ways in which you can cut your own energy bills. Here they are

  • Don’t keep your central heating on ‘constant’. Time it so that it only comes on when you need it. Maybe for an hour in the morning and again later in the day. Just to take the chill off. You can always put it on for an extra hour if you need it. But don’t keep it bubbling away.
  • Set your living room thermostat to 20°. Does it really need to be hotter? It means your heating will only come on when you really need it.
  • If, like our ancestors, you spend most of your life in a single room, do you need to heat the whole of your house? Maybe invest in an oil-filled radiator for that room. It will only cost about 50 pence per hour to run even if you are running it full blast. Less if you set the thermostat correctly so that’s it switches off at room temperature.
  • Leave your car parked up and use public transport where it is practical and affordable to do so. Avoid the hassle of pay by phone parking when you go into town. I recently treated my adult sons to a network rail card giving them a 1/3 discount on off-peak travel. I still think that the £40 discounted fare is too much for an off-peak return trip for two adults traveling from Farnborough to London Waterloo. But it’s better than £60. And I hate to think what it would cost at peak times.
  • Microwave, microwave, microwave. Instead of using a conventional oven. Even for things which you are not supposed to microwave, like fish. You can always finish it off in the frying pan. Microwaves use a typical 85% less energy than a conventional oven.
  • If you are unlucky enough to have an oil fired central heating system and have seen a 100% increase in cost since Trump’s war with Iran. My advice? Just switch it off. You’ve probably got an immersion heater if you need hot water for a bath. So use that when you need it. But remember to switch it off.

business, politics, protest, society, Uncategorized

Economic Impact of Opposing UK Fossil Fuel Extraction

Photo by Jan-Rune Smenes Reite on Pexels.com

My heart always sinks when I see news footage of hobby eco-protesters standing outside a court building, waving placards, and celebrating the stalling of yet another commercial project. This time It was the Rosebank oil exploration project, off Shetland, in which Shell had invested £800 million and involved one of the largest undeveloped oil and gas fields in the UK continental shelf, containing an estimated 300 million barrels. And why do our most senior judiciary seem to think it is their mission to wave their green credentials to tease out the tiniest administrative flaw in the regulatory approval process, to send everything back to the drawing board? Who appoints these people? It follows hot on the heels of another court judgment crushing implementation of proposals to open Britain’s first new coal mine at Whitehaven, for more than 30 years. In each case, the judicial mantra was the same. “That the proposals failed to adequately assess the greenhouse gas emissions tied to burning fossil fuels.” And we know that with a government energy minister so opposed to fossil fuel extraction, that none of these projects are ever likely to happen. But haven’t these eminent legal brains slightly missed the point?

Yes – we know that burning fossil fuels causes climate change. Which is why we need to put in place viable alternatives .But neither the Rosebank nor the Whitehaven projects were about burning fossil fuels. They were about extracting fossil fuels so that we don’t have to import them from abroad. Either way. fossil fuels will still be burnt, because at the moment we have nothing else. And of course those projects would have also created thousands of well-paid jobs. So what is the point they are making? And it is entirely appropriate for me to refer to these eco-protesters as hobbyists, as none of them would have suffered direct personal detriment as a result of either of these projects. It is all about the big abstract ‘we’. And what message does it send to the outside world? A Britain which is so up itself that it is prepared to cut off its nose to spite its commercial face. Who would want to invest in us? The next big battle is going to be about the proposed third runway at Heathrow Airport. Even if it goes ahead, I’m not sure that I will still be around when it is completed. But that’s no reason not to support it.

I really blame the last conservative government for this farce. They had 14 years to drive these projects through. But instead they preferred to spend their time posturing about Brexit and their precious Rwanda scheme, as everything else around them fell apart. And they were a government which was in hock to the NIMBY lobby, which is why the cost of HS2 ballooned almost to the point of cancellation.

When it comes to the third Heathrow runway, I’m with Rachel Reeves. I know she’s had a bad press, but I’m convinced that she’s trying to do her best to grow the British economy. Again, so different from the last lot, the ‘party of business’. But even now, opposition to the third runway is cranking into gear, not least from London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who has promised court proceedings to try to stall the project.

Spending my money to fight a court case against his own parliamentary party? What is that all about? And he hasn’t even consulted me. A case of public money fighting public money. How wasteful. But that is Britain today.

Uncategorized

Cornwall Council’s Car Park Outsourcing: Legal Concerns Explained

Photo by Jens Mahnke on Pexels.com

I have to query the legality of the proposal by Cornwall Council to outsource the management of up to 22 of its car parks, to take them out of statutory control under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. Isn’t that precisely what Robert Goodwill MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, warned against in his open letter to local authority parking managers of 16th September 2014? Well not quite! Goodwill’s letter was aimed at some councils who thought it okay to opt themselves out of the statutory local authority parking regime and instead manage their car parks under Schedule 4 of the Protections of Freedoms Act 2012, which now governs the management of private car parks. It was the 2012 Act which abolished unregulated wheel clamping on private land and instead introduced a regulated process to enable the owners of private car parks to manage their operations. Though why any local authority could have thought it lawful to opt out of statutory regulation is beyond me. But Cornwall’s case is different because the Minister’s 2014 letter makes no mention of leasing arrangements, which is what Cornwall Council is proposing in this case. Hang on!

The prospective lessee of Cornwall’s 22 car parks is not any old company. According to a council report, the prospective lessee will in this case be a wholly owned subsidiary of Cornwall Council. Least, that’s what the Scrutiny Committee report of 4th September 2024 states:

“Following a successful trial at Tower Headland ( Little Fistral) in Newquay, a new model of managing some of our car parks has been considered which supports the principle of decentralisation. Essentially this involves the transfer of a car park site by means of a lease to a council owned company, who would then manage the land; paying rental at least sustaining the income to the council and removing the liability of the council to maintain and manage the asset.”

A council-owned company! How arms length is that? The only other companies we can see mentioned in the reports are the privately owned Treveth and Conserve, which would be managing the day-to-day operation of the car parks.

Key to the legality of outsourcing an off- street parking place is paragraph 3(1) of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, which defines ‘relevant land’ to which Schedule 4 applies and which is stated as follows:

“In this schedule relevant land means land (including land above or below ground level) other than:

a) a highway maintained as a public expense ( within the meaning of section 329(1) of the Highways Act 1980;

b) a parking place which is provided or controlled by a traffic Authority;

c) any land not falling within paragraphs a or b on which the parking of a vehicle is subject to statutory control.”

The other thing which I noticed when reading the officer reports is that, as far as I can see, no mention was made of the Minister’s 2014 warning letter. Nor of Schedule 4 of the Protections of Freedoms Act 2012. Forgive me! But aren’t those ‘material considerations’ for any decision of this type? Apparently not. Let’s see what the Parking Adjudicator makes of it.