society

Why We Should Enjoy Hot Weather: A UK Perspective

Photo by KoolShooters on Pexels.com

I never understand why today it is fashionable to see hot sunny weather as a problem instead of something to be celebrated. As a child going up in the UK, we never had weather like this. Yes, we might get a few sunny days. Rarely above 75°. But mostly, English weather was dreary dreary dreary. Rarely a winter went by with at least one heavy snowfall during January or February, lasting several weeks. Another winter feature was the fog, which made driving conditions difficult. A new phrase was coined, ‘motorway madness’ to describe the vehicle pile ups which occurred when drivers would insist on driving at speed through heavy fog, following the tail-lights of the vehicle in front. In those days, if you wanted hot sunshine, you had to pay for it by buying a package holiday to Spain.

I remember driving through London at the end of 1978 after heavy snowfall and in freezing temperatures.

Because it happened in the days between Christmas and New Year, no-one was prepared to get out of bed to grit the roads. That was a journey I’d never want to repeat. We passed so many smashed up cars.

Things had already begun to change with the long hot Indian summer of 1976 when we had an invasion of giant red ladybirds which would bite you. Anyone remember that? Then in September 2003, the Mercury hit 100° for the first time in living memory in the UK. Wouldn’t someone living in the mini ice age of 17th century Britain have envied that?

Of course a warmer climate in the UK means that adjustments have to be made. I think we are still too much of an ‘ indoor society’, when we should be getting out and enjoying the sunshine, like they do in other parts of the world. It’s why I like to take my computer outside and do my work instead of sitting in a stuffy box room. I’ve never believed in air conditioning. It has never made sense to me for someone to spend money burning energy to keep us in a freezer. How is that good for the planet? If I need to be inside, I’d much rather have a big wooden ceiling fan chug chug chugging overhead

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Uncategorized

London Borough of Redbridge v G Romford County Court 5th February 2025 – Housing Possession

I’m sorry but if you thought you were going to be able to download a transcript of this important judgement, I’m afraid that you are going to be disappointed. That’s unless you are prepared to pay the court stenographer yourself to listen to the tapes and type up that transcript. And that’s going to be expensive. Because Romford County Court is not a court of record. But the case is important because it reminds local authority conveyancers what can happen if they complete on the purchase of a property which happens to be occupied by a residential tenant. Even if that tenant had previously occupied under a shorthold tenancy, which could be ended as any time on 2 months written notice. What is worse, is that an existing shorthold tenancy automatically then converts into a fully secure tenancy under the Housing Act 1985. What a bonus for that residential tenant! Not only do they now have lifetime security. They’ve also got a statutory right to buy. And all because of a simple conveyancing error.

It is standard conveyancing practice that the existence of any residential adult occupier of the property must be disclosed to the buyer before contracts are exchanged. That will include anyone occupying under a shorthold tenancy. If this is not done and those occupancy rights are not brought to an end before completion, the buyer will take subject to those rights of occupation forevermore. Which was what had happened in this case. In fact there was nothing to suggest that the landlord had taken any formal step to terminate the shorthold tenancy, before that transaction completed.

A further physical inspection should take place on the morning of completion just to make sure that the property is in fact vacant before the balance of the purchase money is released. Getting it wrong is always expensive.

business

Top Tips for Filing Your Self-Assessment Tax Return

I never understand why some people wait until almost the January 31st deadline to submit their self-assessment tax return. Or forget to do it altogether and cop a £100 penalty. I uploaded mine yesterday. And it was easier than I had expected. It’s actually a long time since I last filed my own tax return. I had been using a payroll company to do this. But they stopped providing this service. So I had a choice of either finding another accountant or dealing with it myself. I did the latter.

I always used to fill out my own tax returns using the paper forms which HMRC posted out to me. One day my completed form got lost in the system and I began to worry as I got closer to the submission deadline. Online submission was at that time very new and difficult to navigate. Which was why I gave £150 to the payroll company to file it on my behalf.

Even if you are not required to submit a self-assessment tax return, there may be reasons why it is advantageous to do so, particularly if there are things which you can legitimately deduct from your tax liability, like professional subscriptions. So here are a several tips for anyone who has to fill out a self-assessment tax questionnaire:

  1. Pull together the information and get it in as soon as possible, so that you don’t have to worry about it later. Best time to get it in is as soon as you get your P60 (perhaps more than one if you have a portfolio of jobs). It’s better to know now if something is missing, than later.

2. Keep accurate records so that you have all the information to hand when you fill out the online form, particularly about those legitimate deductibles, like professional subscriptions and training courses. I included in my own tax return a deduction of £177 for sundries. But that deduction could have been much bigger if I had kept better records of business purchases. Like the letter-scale which I purchased several months back from Amazon so that I didn’t have to traipse along to the post office and wait in line every time needed to post a larger item. I’ll make sure that I don’t forget when I fill out next year’s return.

3. Don’t forget those charitable donations which you made through the tax year. Legitimate charities can claim back basic rate tax relief directly on any donations you make. But this doesn’t mean that you can’t set it against higher rate tax by including it as a deductible on your tax return. The effect of a gift aid charitable donation is boost your basic rate threshold to reduce the amount of higher rate tax which you would otherwise pay

Law

AI in Legal Research: Risks of Fake Case Citations

Photo by Luca Nardone on Pexels.com

The Law Society Gazette recently reported on a case where a pupil barrister had mistakenly cited fake cases as part of her legal submissions in a case involving a local authority’s duties towards a homeless man. She had found the cases through her internet research and did not realise that the cases which she had cited did not actually exist. They had been entirely made up by an artificial intelligence program even though they appeared to her to be genuine. The result was a wasted costs order not only against her but also against the Law Centre which had instructed her. Add to that the reputational damage against both as well as the possibility of professional sanction. That’s not to say that artificial intelligence should never be used as a research tool. Only that it is a professional responsibility to carry out the follow-up due diligence to ensure that what is cited is absolutely correct.

It’s important to recognise what exactly AI is. As far as I can see, AI, in this situation, is nothing more than an advanced search engine which not only identifies data but then goes on to mash it up and serve up something else out of its components. It’s like me going down to my local breakers yard and collecting bits and pieces to build my own car. I’m sure that if I asked AI to write my next Eurovision hit in the style of Elton John, it would present to me a rehash of Lulu’s ‘Boom Bang Bang’. Which brings me onto another controversial issue. Because if I then go on to use that content as part of my Eurovision entry, I will then be breaching copyright. But that doesn’t mean that I don’t use AI in my work, including the writing of this article.

As I was aware that this was not the first instance of fake cases being cited by AI, I asked my Gemini search engine to find me some other instances where lawyers have been caught out using fake cases generated by AI. It came up with the following cases: New York Aviation Injury Claim (Mata v Avianca 2023); Morgan v Morgan (Wyoming); UK Tax Tribunal Case (Harber v Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs) which involved a self-represented tax payer.

Have I checked any of those cases out before including reference to them in this article? No I haven’t. But neither am I intending to cite them in any court proceedings anytime soon. So I’m afraid that you will just have to trust me.

One of the reasons given by the pupil barrister for her use of AI generated cases was that she did not have direct access to Lexus Nexus or the White Book, which contains the civil practice rules. In those circumstances my own ‘go to’ would be the British and Irish Legal Information Institute, which provides a free on-line legal resource for current case law. It also makes it incumbent for anyone acting for an opponent to also check out case law provided to them by another party, just to make sure that it actually exists.

crime, culture, religion, sex

The Hendrix-Joplin Community – If you join, you will never escape

After 35 years of writing nonfiction, this is my first fiction book. The idea arose from the massive geopolitical changes since Trump took office just over 100 days ago. In writing the book, I have assumed that everything Trump says he’s going to do, actually happens. So the Gulf of Mexico is now the Gulf of America. Greenland and Canada are now America’s 51st and 52nd States. Just for good measure, I have also chucked in the former UK, now New Alaska, as America’s 53rd State, in return for signing away what remains of its oil, gas and mineral assets. It really was a no-brainer.

Caught between tariffs from both the U.S. and Europe. Having outsourced all of its manufacturing to China, and having closed down what remained of its industrial landscape, the former UK was no longer economically viable as a nation-state. Add to that Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from NATO and the Ukraine-style neutrality pact offered to former NATO members in its place.

Don’t worry about climate change. That has already happened. New Alaska is now a silent snow-scape punctuated only by the distant rumble of the extraction plant.

The story focuses on a Waco style cult church, which you can join but never leave. A charismatic hippie pastor who doesn’t only want your money. He also wants access to your wife. Yes – there really are communities like that. But it all turns to bloody murder when someone steals the source of his power.