housing, Law, property

Fixing Britain’s Housing Crisis

This week, we read in the newspapers that planning applications have fallen to a 16-year low.  According to reports, only 2,456 projects were granted planning permission during the second quarter of this year.  Can it really be that low?  The Home Builders Federation has warned that if this trend continues it will lead to a reduction in housing delivery of 44,000 homes a year, which would see supply for England fall to levels not seen for a decade.  So what is it all about?  If we want to get Britain building, shouldn’t we be issuing planning permissions like confetti? 

According to Stewart Baseley, HBF Executive Chairman, the opposite has been happening, with the policy environment becoming increasingly anti-development and anti-business, resulting in a sharp fall in the number of homes being built.  He added, “Fewer homes being built during an acute housing crisis has clear social implications, in particular for young people, and we’ll end up reducing the economic activity and cost jobs”.

So why is government policy skewed so much towards the ‘no’ lobby.  Why at this critical time, has Michael Gove abolished the requirements for councils to have a five-year land supply for housing development?  We’ve seen the same attitude towards green energy in which the ‘no’ lobby has been given a veto to block on-shore wind farms and the electricity pylons needed to transport green energy.

If you don’t believe there’s a housing crisis, look around you.  Young people sleeping in shop doorways.  Thirty-somethings still living with their mums because they can’t afford to get something of their own.  Desperate renters in a bidding war with each other, just to find somewhere to live

It’s not just about supply and demand.  The housing market itself has become distorted. Young couples cannot get on the property ladder because they are being priced out by a cash-rich buy-to-let market which is subsidized by the housing benefit system.  Councils are having to rent back properties on their own estates just to meet their statutory housing obligations.  The creation of a new class of middle-people plugging the gap in the provision of social housing, whilst at the same time taking their cut from the housing benefit system.

What has caused crazy state of affairs?  What are the solutions?  We start with the causes.

The causes of Britain’s 2023 housing crisis

There is no single cause of today’s housing crisis.  There is a multiplicity of causes which, over the course of several decades, have converged together to create that crisis.  Here they are.

The statutory right to buy

Remember that when statutory right to buy was introduced in 1981, there was no buy-to-let market.  Most homes sold under right-to buy remained in owner-occupation until the private rental market opened up in the 1990s.  We now have a situation in which, in some areas, up to one half of ex right-to buy properties are owned by private landlords and in many cases rented back to the same local authorities which originally sold them.  There is also an intrinsic unfairness in the State gifting massive subsidies to a select group of people whom, by chance, are already in subsidised housing, at the expense of everyone else.  Yet the government appears wedded to it.  And why should any local authority invest public money in the provision of new social housing if, in three years’ time, they might be forced to sell it off at a discount.

Not enough new homes being built

I suspect that one of the reasons why fewer new homes are being built today than in previous decades, is that housebuilding is no longer as profitable as it once was.  There are too many things getting in the way: one of them being shopping-list planning policies which are not only administratively slow but can also reduce the viability of a proposed housing development.  It is quite right that any housing development must stand the cost of upgrading the public infrastructure required to serve the new development, including education and social facilities.  It is also fair that someone who benefits financially from the grant of a large residential planning permission should contribute to the cost of providing affordable housing to those who cannot afford to buy privately on their estates.  The issue is that the process of securing on-site affordable housing through the planning system is too cumbersome.  Many housebuilders would quite willingly make a financial contribution towards the provision of off-site affordable housing, just to get the development of the ground, and which the local housing authority could then spend as it thinks appropriate in providing new affordable housing.  And wouldn’t many cash-strapped housing authorities prefer a simple cash-injection?

The number of empty homes

According to official statistics, during 2022, the number of long-term empty homes in the UK stood at 248,633, up 5% on the previous year and which has increased annually since 2011 (excepting only the covid years).  But it can’t be right that someone can choose to keep a residential property empty and unused whilst other people do not have a permanent home.  In many of these cases, there are reasons why the property has remained empty for many years instead of being brought into beneficial occupation and use.  An owner may have died or moved abroad or into residential care.  Their whereabouts may have become untraceable.  Perhaps no one has taken out probate in relation to a deceased’s estate.  Maybe a property has remained empty for so long that it has become dilapidated and uninhabitable.  But that doesn’t help Britain’s Housing crisis.

What about re-introducing rent controls?  Wouldn’t that solve the crisis in rental accommodation?

Sadly no.  Statutory rent controls never worked in the quarter century they were in force until their abolition by the Housing Act 1988.  And there is no reason to suppose that they would work any better now.  Until statutory rent controls were abolished at the beginning of 1990, safe legal advice to anyone thinking of renting out their home was “don’t”.  Letting out a residential property carried too much risk.  It wasn’t just that you might never get your property back.  The rents you received for your property were not in your control. A rent tribunal could reduce it to a derisory level.  Not only would you be accommodating another family.  You would also be subsidising their living costs, even if they had more disposable income than you did.  No one is going to volunteer to do that.  It’s why someone working temporarily abroad might have been advised simply to leave their home empty, instead of renting it out to someone else.

What about the proposed abolition of section 21 no fault evictions?

Abolishing section 21 will give existing residential tenants a little more peace of mind, provided they keep to the terms of their tenancy.  But it’s not going to make private renting more affordable.  When section 21 was originally introduced by the Housing Act 1988, it was to give prospective residential landlords the confidence to let out their properties safe in the knowledge that they could get back vacant possession when needed.  Back in 1988, no-fault eviction was not problematic for residential tenants because it was a new market and there were so many alternative properties to move into.  Contrast that with the position today, where someone evicted from their existing rent the property might have nowhere else to go.

What about stamp duty holidays?  Would that help first time buyers?

The problem with stamp duty holidays is that it leads to a stampede as desperate homebuyers try to get their purchases completed before the holiday ends.  It’s great for Sellers, who can soak up the value of the tax-break by increasing property prices.   

Here are the solutions which will work

  1. Abolish right to buy.  Now!  It won’t solve Britain’s housing crisis.  But it will stop it getting worse.  It will also give councils the confidence they need to invest in the provision of new affordable housing, safe in the knowledge that it will be kept permanently available to meet future housing need.
  2. Make the town planning system 100% self-financing, so lack of resource can no longer provide an excuse for delay.  Where local planning authorities are still unable to determine planning applications within the statutory turnaround time, give developers the right to refer their planning applications to independent expert determination.  The statutory appeals process is just too slow.
  3. Give housebuilders the option of meeting their affordable housing responsibilities by paying a commuted sum to the council’s housing revenue account, to be spent on the provision of new affordable housing in the way the council considers most appropriate.  Councils would love it.  So would housebuilders. Make it part of the community infrastructure Levy.
  4. Free up 248,633 long term empty homes by putting them in to public auction. Councils already have powers to compulsory purchase long term empty dwellings.  But like the Empty Dwelling Management Orders, introduced by the Housing Act 2004, they are too slow and cumbersome to be of any practical use.  So why not create a swift summary process whereby councils can apply to a magistrates’ court for an order forcing the sale of a long-term empty property?
  5. For councils and other social housing providers to use the current collapse in the housing market to replenish their housing stock.  There is no better time to do it.  Yes-interest rates are currently high.  But they won’t always be high.  And think about the massive savings in the housing benefit budget if councils no longer had to rent back from private landlords to meet their statutory housing responsibilities.

Now the big question.

Will these ideas work in solving Britain’s Housing crisis?  You can bet they will!

V. Charles Ward Solicitor and LARTPI

September 2023

business, housing, Law, property, real estate, society, writing

Positive Feedback From Today’s Conveyancer

Photo by RODNAE Productions on Pexels.com

As a published legal writer it is always encouraging to receive positive editorial feedback. Here is something I received January 24th 2023 from Jamie Lennox, the Editor of Today’s Conveyancer. I also enclose a link to the article which generated that feedback.

Dear Viv

I hope you’re well. Just wanted to drop you a note regarding your recently published piece on Leaseholder Deeds of Certificate. It’s been incredibly popular with our readership: the data shows it’s been read more than any other piece over the last 7 days, and we’ve heard it’s been shared on social media and Rob Hailstone’s Bold Legal Forum too. Thus, a big thank you is in order from me!

I think it’s particularly relevant to the current discourse surrounding the ever-increasing complexity of conveyancing. I’ve heard one conveyancer suggest a separate law degree is required for the BSA 2022 alone! With climate change guidance just around the corner from the Law Soc, I imagine a similar conversation will take place.

Should you want to follow up this piece with any more guidance/best practice, we’d bite your hand off. Let me know your thoughts.

Thank you

Jamie Lennox

Editor

https://todaysconveyancer.co.uk/leaseholder-deeds-of-certificate-what-you-need-to-know/: Positive Feedback From Today’s Conveyancer Read more: Positive Feedback From Today’s Conveyancer

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
housing, Law, property, real estate, society

Best Law Books For Residential Leaseholders

We have been asked to recommend books to help residential leaseholders understand their rights. Here is a link to our selected books from a variety of authors, each of whom are experts in their field. They cover everything from service charges, lease-extensions, buying out a landlord’s interest. How to deal with a difficult ground-landlord.

https://shepherd.com/best-books/laws-on-residential-leaseholders-rights-in-the-uk

housing, Law, property, real estate, Uncategorized

Protect Yourself Against Cladding Replacement Costs

Rolling Update detailing changes to Fire Safety Law as regards high-rise residential buildings – Updated to April 2023 

Bruce&Holly

This rolling update focuses on:

The Leaseholder Deed of Certificate

The Landlord Certificate

Lease Extensions

Leaseholder Deeds of Certificate and Landlords’ Certificates are now key to the protections which Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022 offers to high-rise residential leaseholders against the costs of remediating defective cladding and other non-cladding related safety-issues.  The two documents make critical reading for any high-rise residential leaseholder, building-owner, conveyancer or managing agent.

This rolling update is intended as a companion to Fire Safety Law: a Practical Guide for Leaseholders, Building-Owners and Conveyancers, which is published through Taylor and Francis and went on general release in September 2022.  The book itself explains the structure of modern fire-safety law with particular reference to multi-occupied residential buildings.  This rolling update will keep you alerted to new Fire-Safety legislation going forward. In this April 2023 update, we look specifically at how the protections apply (or may not apply) to statutory lease extensions under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 as amended.

We start by offering you a 20% discount on the recommended retail price of the Fire Safety Law:: a Practical Guide for Leaseholders, Building-owners and Conveyancers together with a link to the Taylor and Francis website. When checking out, just type in discount code FLA22, which will enable you to purchase the book at a 20% discount.

https://www.routledge.com/Fire-Safety-Law-A-Practical-Guide-for-Leaseholders-Building-Owners-and/Ward/p/book/9781032271415

In this Update we focus firstly on the protections which Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022 now offers to high-rise residential leaseholders against the costs of replacing defective cladding as well as other non-cladding fire-risks, where those defects arose either during the initial construction of the building within the previous 30 years or during a later refurbishment of the building. Secondly, we look at why these statutory protections may be lost when a residential lease is extended under the 1993 Act.

Disclaimer

This bulletin contains no more than our interpretation of some very-complex legislation and associated government guidance which is intended to protect qualifying residential-leaseholders against the future cost of remediation work to replace defective-cladding as well as associated non-cladding-remediation.  We cannot guarantee that a court or tribunal would see things in exactly the same way.  It is therefore important that every conveyancer takes the time to read the legislation and relies on their own professional judgment as to the advice which they need to give their leaseholder or prospective-leaseholder client.  Likewise, if you are a leaseholder or someone responsible for the management of a multi-occupied residential building, it is important that you take your own independent legal advice before acting on any of the information contained within this bulletin.

Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022 (remediation-costs under qualifying leases etc)

Our starting point has to be Schedule 8 which sets out the framework of a new regime to protect certain residential leaseholders against the cost of removing and replacing defective cladding as well as in relation to any non-cladding fire-risk.  Sitting beneath Schedule 8 are the Building Safety (Leaseholder Protections)(England)Regulations 2022 and the Building Safety (Leaseholder Protections Information etc)(England)Regulations 2022, which, together, put in place the administrative processes needed to determine which a residential leaseholders qualify for such protection and which leaseholders enjoy more limited protection.

Schedule 8 does not give blanket protection to all high-rise residential leaseholders against the cost of remedial work either as regards defective cladding or other non-cladding related fire-risk.  The protection Schedule 8 offers is selective between different leaseholders either as regards the level of protection which is offered, or whether they are protected at all.  The owner of a ‘qualifying lease’ will be fully protected against the costs of replacing of defective cladding if the defect arose either during initial construction the building or during a later refurbishment.  But it will not cover a fire-risk resulting from later wear-and tear which was not attributable to any defective installation. 

For non-cladding fire-risk, whether a protected leaseholder enjoys either full or partial protection against the costs of remediation will depend on other factors, including whether the ground-landlord could in any way be regarded as responsible for the non-cladding defect or if the corporate-landlord is considered to have sufficient financial net-worth to shoulder the burden of such costs.  Even the owners of leases which are not qualifying leases may be exonerated from the liability to meet remediation costs in circumstances where responsibility for the original defect can properly be placed at the door of the ground landlord.

But even if the fire-risk remediation-costs cannot be placed at the door of the individual leaseholder, someone still has to pay for it.  And that someone will be the ground-landlord, if they are still around and are able to pay for it.  Even if that ground-landlord filed for insolvency, leaseholders can still look to any associated company which is still in existence, to take that liability.  But the ability to pass remediation liabilities back to a ground-landlord, may be of little help to those leaseholders who are collectively their own landlord through a freehold management company.  For those leaseholders, another source of funds to carry out the required remediation, will be a government grant.

The administrative complication for anyone collecting service charges in a high-rise residential building is to know which of the leases are ‘qualifying’ and which leases are not-qualifying, and to produce two sets of service charge demands for each class of leaseholder.  So who is a ‘qualifying leaseholder’ and how is the managing-agent to determine who qualifies for special-protection and who does not?  It is the Building Safety (Leaseholder Protections)(England) Regulations 2002 and the associated Information Regulations which now provide the documentary evidence to determine who is protected and who is not.

Who is a Qualifying leaseholder?

The reference date for determining which leases qualify for the fullest protection under Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022 is 14th February 2022. If a lease was a qualifying lease on 14 February, 2022, it will forevermore remain a qualifying lease carrying the fullest statutory protections against remediation-costs under Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022.  If a lease was not a qualifying lease on 14 February, 2022, it will never become a qualifying lease.  It also follows that no lease granted after 14 February, 2022 can ever qualify for the fullest protection under Schedule 8.

To have qualified for Schedule 8 protection on 14 February, 2022, the flat must have been situated within a block of flats at least 11 metres high or with at least five storeys (a ‘relevant builing’).  On 14 February, 2022, that flat must either have been in owner-occupation or, if not in owner-occupation, be owned by someone who did not own more than three UK properties in total.  So it means that some small buy-to-let landlords, including possibly corporate landlords, will qualify for protection if, on 14 February, 2022, if they did not own more than three UK Properties in total.

How does the owner of a qualifying lease evidence its protected status?

The only way in which the owner of a flat can properly evidence the fact that their lease was qualifying on 14 February 2022 is by completing and delivering to the ground-landlord a ‘Leaseholder Deed of Certificate’ in the form set out in the schedule to the Building Safety (Leaseholder ProtectionsInformation etc) England Regulations 2022, which took effect 21 July, 2022. 

As its name suggests, this document has to be executed as a deed.  That is to say, it must be signed by the leaseholder in the presence of a witness, who must also sign the document and provide their own full name and address.  A Leaseholder Deed of Certificate maybe provided by the leaseholder at any time but must be provided at the landlord’s request, failing which the landlord will be entitled to assume that the lease is not-qualifying.  In other words, the leaseholder may lose their Schedule 8 protection if they fail to provide a Deed of Certificate when asked to do so.

Providing a Leaseholder Deed of Certificate is, for all practical purposes, a self-certification exercise in which the leaseholder answers a number questions enabling the landlord to assess whether the particular lease qualifies or not.  The questions include: whether the flat was owner/occupied on 14 February, 2022; if the flat was not owner/occupied, whether the leaseholder owned more than two other properties in the UK; the price at which the flat was last sold before 14th February 2022; whether it is a shared ownership lease and, if so, the total share owned by the leaseholder as at 14 February, 2022.  As well as answering the questions, the leaseholder must also provide documentary evidence supporting the answers provided in the document.

A consequence of failing to provide a Deed of Certificate when asked to do so is that the ground-landlord may thereafter assume that the lease is not protected, when carrying out its service-charge calculations.  In other words, the protected status of the lease could be lost.  Where the leaseholder completing a Deed of Certificate was not the owner of the flat on 14 February, 2022 and does not already have the required information, it is then incumbent on the current leaseholder to make enquiries of the former leaseholder to establish the qualifying status of the flat on 14 February 2022.

It is also incumbent on the leaseholder to make enquiries to establish the price at which the flat was last sold before 14th February 2022 and, where it is possible to do so, to evidence that price from Land Registry records.  A Deed of Certificate is also an important title document as it is needed to establish the qualifying status of a flat as at 14 February, 2022.  It is therefore critical that a leaseholder keeps a copy of the certificate provided and that the landlord’s receipt of that certificate is acknowledged, for the record.  Anyone acting on the purchase of a flat post 14th February 2022 will need to ask for a copy of the Deed of Certificate evidencing the protected status of the lease, or not, as the case may be.

What protections does Qualifying Status offer?

  1. A qualifying leaseholder is protected completely against the costs of remediating flammable cladding in circumstances where the inherent defect resulted from the original construction of the building within the previous 30 years or later refurbishment or other works.
  2. Both qualifying and non-qualifying leaseholders are protected against the costs of remediating both cladding and non-cladding related fire-risk, in circumstances where the ground-landlord was also the developer of the building or carried out a later refurbishment or was responsible for commissioning that work within the previous 30 years.
  3. A qualifying leaseholder has complete protection against the costs of remediating both cladding and a non-cladding fire-risk in circumstances where on 14 February, 2022 the ground-landlord had a net-worth of more than two million pounds per relevant building.
  4. A qualifying leaseholder has limited protection against the cost of remediating non-cladding safety-defects in circumstances where the ground-landlord’s net-worth per relevant building on 14 February, 2022 was less than two million pounds.  In those circumstances, each qualifying residential leaseholder can be required to contribute a capped amount of £15,000 in Greater London and £10,000 elsewhere.  That cap is set at Zero for properties worth less than £325,000 in London or £175,000 elsewhere.  For properties worth more than one million pounds, the cap is £50,000.  If the property is worth over two million pounds, the cap is £100,000.  There are also special rules for apportioning liabilities in shared ownership properties. In all cases payment of the capped costs can be spread over 10 years.

The Landlord Certificate

If it is the leaseholder’s Deed of Certificate which evidences whether a lease is a qualifying lease for the purposes of Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022, it is the Landlord Certificate which contains the information needed to calculate how much the landlord is entitled to charge for building-safety works.  The ground-landlord must provide the leaseholder with a Landlord Certificate in any of the following circumstances:

  1. When they want to pass on any remediation-costs on to a leaseholder through the service-charge.
  2. Within four weeks from receiving notification from a leaseholder that their interest is to be sold.
  3. Within four weeks of the landlord becoming aware of a relevant defect which was not covered by a previous Landlord Certificate.
  4. Within four weeks of the leaseholder requesting a Landlord Certificate.

Information to be contained in the Landlord Certificate includes: the name and address of the relevant landlord on 14 February, 2022; the name and address of the current landlord; names and addresses of any superior relevant landlords; information requiring the net-worth of the landlord on 14 February, 2022; questions as to whether the landlord was in any way responsible for the relevant defect or the commissioning of that work; works previously taken to remedy relevant defects and amounts paid for that work.  The Landlord Certificate has to be set out in the pro forma attached to the Building Safety (Leaseholder Protection)(England)Regulations 2022.

Dealing with Default

Building-owners are under an obligation to make their buildings safe, including fixing historical building safety-defects.  The way for leaseholders to enforce that obligation is by applying to a First Tier Tribunal for a remediation order or a remediation contribution order.  Failure on the part of the ground-landlord to comply with either is enforceable through the county court.

Where the Building Safety Act protections do not apply

  1. To buildings of a height which is less than 11 metres or five storeys.
  2. Where the defect was not a result of the initial construction of a building or later adaption or refurbishment.
  3. To disrepair which is not related to building-safety (which is defined a either as a fire-risk or something affecting the stability of the building).

Statutory Extension Leases

The problem with statutory extension leases granted under the 1993 Act is that they take effect in law as a surrender and regrant of the original lease but on the extended terms. What this could means is that an extension lease completed after 14 February, 2022 might not qualify for the statutory protections which applied to the original lease granted before that reference date. The government has recognized this legal anomaly in updated advice “Qualifying Date, Qualifying Lease and Extent’ first published 21 July 2022 and updated 6 April 2023 in which it states in paragraph 8:

“Leaseholders should seek legal advice to make sure explicitly in these agreements that their protections are extended as part of their leases. It was intended to work like this and freeholders should make sure that lease extensions reflect this position.”

So ultimately, it’s a matter for negotiation. But what incentive is there for any ground-landlord to agree to extend statutory protections, which might not otherwise apply to the extended lease? Until there is a either a test case or the law is changed to make it more explicit, we will not know the answer.

To receive future updates from us either in relation to fire safety law or in relation to any other subject, please provide your e-mail address using the button below.  Thank you.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
business, housing, Law, politics, property, real estate

Why are first time buyers priced out of the UK housing market?

It’s because the market has become distorted. It’s not just about too many buyers chasing too few properties. It’s not about interest rates. It’s because first time buyers are not just competing against other first time buyers but also the buy-to-let market.   So why the distortion?

It’s because councils no longer own sufficient stock to meet their social housing responsibilities. Too much of it has been sold under right-to-buy and more than 40% is now owned by private landlords. So councils have to rent-back properties on their own estates to meet their statutory housing responsibilities and pay those inflated costs through the housing benefits system. It is that state-subsidised demand which has pushed private-sector rents and property prices through the roof. Everybody loses: the taxpayer; first time buyers; private renters. Everybody that is, except the private landlord. V. Charles Ward, Author, ‘Housing Regeneration: a Plan for Implementation’